Thursday, July 22, 2010

Empire Gone Amok

From last August the plans for Iraq were to downsize troop levels from 130,000 to 50,000. The cost of maintaining our huge embassy in Iraq was $1.5 billion in 2009 and estimated to cost $1.8 billion each for years 2010 and 2011. Most of the cost has to do with security along with logistics (fuel, food, transport, etc.).

Today we find that the State Department is basically asking for their own contracted army (a blackwater mercenary type of force if you will) to provide security for the billion dollar embassy we constructed in Baghdad.

The process is ironic if you think about it for a minute or two. The State Department is for the most part a very left-leaning bureaucracy that traditionally emphasizes diplomacy and process over military action. The White House made big promises of leaving Iraq. Technically, the army is leaving Iraq, but in fact the Pentagon will continue and in fact increase expenditures there as soldiers are replaced with higher paid contracted personnel which will be supplied with all the high tech gadgetry and equipment currently employed. If "liberals" labeled the previous arrangement as an occupation, how is this any different? Technically, the military is leaving, but it will be replaced with contracted personnel that is even less accountable.

The plan for Iraq that was sold to the American public was to provide stability so that a freely elected, functioning government would take over and the region become less volatile. While that was certainly an objective, the fact that we constructed a billion dollar embassy (the largest in the world), and plan to maintain a presence there at $1.8 billion/year into perpetuity, indicates there was a much larger plan in store.
Iraq is projected to surpass Saudi Arabia in oil exports in about a decade. Bush and Cheney were aware of this for sure, and the left never fails to point this out. However, Obama is following through on the template, but attempting to give the public the perception that America is leaving. The hypocrisy is great. Does the main stream media provide analysis and discussion that would educate the public? Ha.
While my mind is on the unbelievable transition from a governed Republic into an empire/police state, you might want to check out Charles Hugh Smith's Thursday Blog. Homeland Security has morphed into an untenable monstrosity.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Welcome to the New Economy

Charles Hugh Smith described the 12-step process (printed below) in which the wealth of the country now flows from its citizens to the megabanks in his July 8th posting titled "The Con of the Decade."

1. Enable trillions of dollars in mortgages guaranteed to default by packaging unlimited quantities of them into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), creating umlimited demand for fraudulently originated loans.
2. Sell these MBS as "safe" to credulous investors, institutions, town councils in Norway, etc., i.e. "the bezzle" on a global scale.
3. Make huge "side bets" against these doomed mortgages so when they default then the short-side bets generate billions in profits.
4. Leverage each $1 of actual capital into $100 of high-risk bets.
5. Hide the utterly fraudulent bets offshore and/or off-balance sheet (not that the regulators you had muzzled would have noticed anyway).
6. When the longside bets go bad, transfer hundreds of billions of dollars in Federal guarantees, bailouts and backstops into the private hands which made the risky bets, either via direct payments or via proxies like AIG. Enable these private Power Elites to borrow hundreds of billions more from the Treasury/Fed at zero interest.
7. Deposit these funds at the Federal Reserve, where they earn 3-4%. Reap billions in guaranteed income by borrowing Federal money for free and getting paid interest by the Fed.
8. As profits pile up, start buying boatloads of short-term U.S. Treasuries. Now the taxpayers who absorbed the trillions in private losses and who transferred trillions in subsidies, backstops, guarantees, bailouts and loans to private banks and corporations, are now paying interest on the Treasuries their own money purchased for the banks/corporations.
9. Slowly acquire trillions of dollars in Treasuries--not difficult to do as the Federal government is borrowing $1.5 trillion a year.
10. Stop buying Treasuries and dump a boatload onto the market, forcing interest rates to rise as supply of new T-Bills exceeds demand (at least temporarily). Repeat as necessary to double and then triple interest rates paid on Treasuries.
11. Buy hundreds of billions in long-term Treasuries at high rates of interest. As interest rates rise, interest payments dwarf all other Federal spending, forcing extreme cuts in all other government spending.
12. Enjoy the hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments being paid by taxpayers on Treasuries that were purchased with their money but which are safely in private hands.
The Treasury holds biweekly auctions in order to sell debt. Zero Hedge reported another $35 billion in 3-year denominated US Treasury bonds were sold today.
The US government is another $35 billion in the debt sink hole. The cost of this marginal addition to our existing debt load ($10 trillion? $100 trillion? who cares) was just 1.055%, which was gobbled up briskly at a 3.20 Bid To Cover. The bulk of the buying came from Primary Dealers who took down the highest portion of the auction, or 45.1%, since May of 2009, when PDs were responsible for 56.6% of the takedown. Indirect bidders, coming in at 40.6%, was the lowest indirect take down since January, when they were responsible for just 38%. The balance of 14.3% was left to the Direct Bidders. The Bid To Cover at 3.20 came in well above the LTM average of 3.03%.
Now that the United States is running $1.5+ trillion deficits annually, there simply aren't enough dollars in the world (China, Japan, or anywhere else) to suck up this amount of debt. When the US was running $400 billion deficits, the Chinese and other foreigners bought the excess. One fear in America was that, once the deficits reached large levels like what we are running today, the yields on the treasuries would rise causing interest rates to spike upward which in turn would wreak havoc on the economy. For now, the Fed has come up with a solution. A comment below the Zero Hedge article sums it up this way:
It's brilliant, in a way.  A mechanism for loaning into existence money we don't have at a very low cost, with the system perpetuated by the reality that the overall world economy is so messed up, courtesy of the same Primary Dealers, that there aren't that many real alternatives to Treasury investment.  Thus the ability of the Fed to continue loaning money into existence at ridiculously low cost is limited only by an upper bound where 1-3% of the total public debt becomes prohibitively expensive as part of the overall budget. For example, if the public debt becomes $30 trillion, then an average cost of say 2% is still only $600 billion a year, which can be easily managed by cuts in the Pentagon budget and the elimination of any remaining social safety nets.  We've done it, an end run around the Second Law of Thermodynamics.  It's a proud day in America.
So how does this process effect Americans and the economy? Well, for one thing, it keeps inflation in check. The Fed loans the money into existence (at 0.0 - 0.25%), which the banks then use to purchase Treasury bonds (a nice profit at zero risk) instead of making loans into the economy. Over time, the banks are able to recapitalized.  Because the Fed is creating money, and the money is pouring into US Treasuries, the yield remains low, thus the interest payment on the national debt does not explode, but creeps up at a steady pace. This process is wonderful for banks and allows the government to stay in business rather than quickly going the way of Greece.

There are down sides of course. Because the banks have every incentive to purchase treasury bonds and not loan out money, the economy cannot be expanded via loans. Other than large corporations, there isn't much saved capital available to start business.

As government deficits annually top $1.5 trillion ,  interest payments on the debt continue to rise, albeit at a slower rate as long as yields remain low. In order to pay the holders of the debt (think megabanks courtesy of Ben Bernanke), entitlements must begin to shrink and taxes raised. The downsizing of entitlements combined with higher taxes will further shrink the economy and impoverish the citizenry. The remaining assets of the citizenry will simply flow through the government to the megabanks as these entities hold a larger and larger proportion of the national debt. Instead of primarily paying higher taxes to China in exchange for cheap goods, US citizens will pay higher taxes to megabanks in exchange for .... nothing?

For the immediate future, I'm thinking the next two years at least, the United States and the world in general should see lower employment, higher taxes, and lower real estate values. Smallish banks will be taken over and gobbled up by larger banks. The megabanks will continue to reap profits even as they keep depreciating assets off the balance sheet. The argument we continue to hear is that the system is recovering and the process of restoring the banks is essential for a full recovery - even if it destroys the citizenry in the process.